Penalties for Marijuana use Increased

=======================

Partnership for a Drug Free America's main funding sources are, in order of importance, pharmaceutical companies, the tobacco industry and the alcohol industry - their inference being that legal drug industries, by denouncing illegal drugs, might increase their market share.

========================

Nonetheless, there is some evidence that decreased marijuana use leads to increased alcohol and other drug consumption. The New York Times reported in 1992 that in studies by UC-Irvine in conjunction with Princeton, and by graduate students at Harvard, data showed that as penalties for marijuana use increased, alcohol consumption did too. And as marijuana penalties decreased, so too did other drug- and alcohol-related emergency-room visits .

=========================

Conspiracy, you ask? "There are vested interests," says conservative Hoover Institution fellow and former San Jose Police chief Joseph McNamara. "It's not a conspiracy, but the government always promotes government growth. There are vast programs springing up for mandatory treatment; there's the drug-testing industry as well as the DEA and other enforcement agencies. The military is involved as well. Then you have the prison industry, which is the fastest growing government sector."

=============

But, you don't need to smoke pot to realize that the real drug problem in this country is not the drugs. And we can help solve drug problems, crime  problems, environmental problems - even our racial problems if we say no to George Bush and get together and grow more pot!

==============

People who are under the influence of marijuana most of the time, like people who are drunk most of the time, may not get good grades in school or promotions at work. But that does not mean that occasional marijuana use renders people incapable of academic or professional success, any more than an occasional drink does. The staunchest opponents of marijuana invest the drug with the power to permanently transform people, ruining their potential and turning them against society.

===============

The tricks of anti-pot propaganda are usually more subtle, however. A common approach is to cite the immediate effects of smoking marijuana without noting that they wear off when the drug wears off. In a joint statement that accompanied the release of a 1995 report called Legalization: Panacea or Pandora's Box (you can guess which side they came down on), Bill Bennett and Joseph Califano, the former Health, Education, and Welfare secretary who heads the Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, said that "marijuana use...savages short term memory, sharply curtails ability to concentrate and diminishes motor functions."

================

1930's propaganda

Although drug warriors nowadays rarely claim that marijuana causes crime, that charge played an important role in building support for state and federal prohibition in the 1920s and '30s. A 1938 book, Marijuana, America's New Drug Problem, quoted an account by New Orleans Public Safety Commissioner Frank Gomila of a "crime wave" in the late '20s: "Youngsters known to be 'muggle-heads" fortified themselves with the narcotic and proceeded to shoot down police, bank clerks and casual bystanders. Mr. Eugene Stanley, at that time District Attorney, declared that many of the crimes in New Orleans and the south were thus committed by criminals who relied on the drug to give them false courage and freedom from restraint. Dr. George Roeling, Coroner, reported that of 450 prisoners investigated, 125 were confirmed users of marihuana. Mr. W.B. Graham, State Narcotic Officer, declared in 1936 that 60 percent of the crimes committed in New Orleans were by marihuana users."

=================

The gateway theory is also the last resort of drug warriors who are frustrated by the lack of evidence that marijuana is a menace. In the 1984 book Getting tough on Gateway Drugs, Dr. Robert Dupont estimated that "up to 50 percent of regular users of marijuana also use heroin"  In its 1995 paper on drug legalization Califano's Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse reported that "12 to 17 year olds who smoke marijuana are 85 times more likely to use cocaine than those who do not."

 Formulations of this kind obscure two crucial points: First, most marijuana users never even try another illegal drug, let alone use it regularly. Second, it is not safe to conclude from the fact that marijuana users are more likely to use heroin or cocaine that marijuana use results in heroin or cocaine use. (It is probably also true that adults who wear jeans more than three days a week and people who ride motorcycles without a helmet are more likely to try heroin or cocaine.) In this case as in so many others, anti-drug polemicists tend to confuse correlation with causation.

=================

According to a 1999 and 1990 American Jail Association survey, less than 20% of jails reported having drug treatment programs involving paid staff and 75% provided no group therapy, drug education, transition planning, or referral to community drug treatment agencies

=================

Who sits on the NORML advisory board? In 1979, among the board members were: Hugh Hefner, Actor/Kennedy Peter Lawford, Geraldo Rivera, Hunter S. Thompson, Ron Dellums, Ramsey Clark, Dr. Benjamin Spock. Among those in 2003: Willie Nelson, director Robert Altman, Woody Harrelson, Bill Maher, Hunter S. Thompson (still!), Terence Hallinan.

=================

Abundant and convincing evidence exists to support the view that illegal drug use has more to do with choice, values, and expectations than with addiction, compulsion, or disease. Drug policy is always based on explanations for drug use, but the explanations are diverse. US drug policies are largely based on the assumption that drugs cause addiction, but many leading researchers view this as a social construct.

===================  

People have a right to get stoned. They have a right to think and explore their own minds. This is as intimate a part of their being as their sexuality. Any culture which mitigates that is clearly afraid of a full and fair and open dialogue about what reality is and what real human values ought to be. 

Terence McKenna

===================

 Merely forbidding natural substances and policing the population for compliance is an inadequate means of controlling potentially dangerous drugs in a free society.

This policy is failing to protect both our rights and our safety. Since demand for consciousness altering substances is legitimate and will always exist, prohibition maintains a state of these substances being perpetually and completely out of control.

We must regain control over these substances by ensuring the safety of children from drugs and respecting the rights of adults to choose from certified safe and pure commercial products and to freely grow their own plants of choice. We can do both!

==================

"Eventually the right to determine our own food and drug preferences will be seen as a natural consequence of human dignity, as long as it is done in a way that does not limit the rights of others."        

                 Terence McKenna              

==================  

"At one point consciousness-altering devices like the microscope and telescope were criminalized for exactly the same reasons that psychedelic plants were banned in later years. They allow us to peer into bits and zones of Chaos."            Timothy Leary

===================

"The very idea of being punished for self gratification and indulgence, in whatever form it takes, is not only absurd but it's dangerous. It is simply a matter of civil rights."

=============

The drug war is much like our attempt to stamp out alcohol in the 1920s.

Consider the resolution of the Women's Organization for National Prohibition Reform, passed unanimously at its first convention in April 1930:

"......(W)e are convinced that National Prohibition is wrong in principle” has been equally disastrous in consequences in the hypocrisy, the corruption, the tragic loss of life and the appalling increase of crime which have attended the abortive attempt to enforce it; in the shocking effect it has had upon the youth of the nation; in the impairment of constitutional guarantees of individual rights; in the weakening of the sense of solidarity between the citizen and the government which is the only sure basis of a country's strength."

 A market cannot be destroyed by making it more profitable, and that profit corrupts both sides of the fight.

As in the 1920s, the arrestees are poor and powerless, sometimes not choirboys.

  But why destroy the life of a man - and his family - because he is not a choirboy?

====================

THEY SAY SMOKING MARIJUANA CAN WRECK YOUR LIFE. AND THE GOVERNMENT IS MAKING SURE OF IT.

====================

Unless someone can figure out how to nullify the immutable laws of supply and demand, the counterproductive war on drugs will remain counterproductive.  Our drug war is financing organized crime at home and international terrorists abroad.

Forward to tidbits 11                   Return to Tidbits

    adicting drugs alcohol & tobacco
           

           Joseph McNamara & the prison industrial complex    

       Joseph McNamara

 

                                                Drug  Czar Bill Bennett  on drugs

           Bill Bennett

 

         Dr. Robert Dupont

Dr. Robert DuPont was director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the nation’s second White House Drug Czar serving from 1973 – 1978 under Presidents Nixon and Ford. 

             Terrence McKenna on rights of adults to choose

           Terrence McKenna

    thinking of the failed war on drugs