Rand study financed by the U. S. Army and the government drug-control agencies found that funds spent on domestic drug treatment were 23 times as effective as "source country control" (Clinton's Colombian aid plan), 11 times as effective as interdiction, and 7 times as effective as domestic law enforcement. The "drug war" targets poor peasants abroad and poor people at home; by the use of force, instead of constructive measures to alleviate problems at a fraction of the cost.

"If you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem."

No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society. If we're looking for the sources of our troubles, we shouldn't test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power.

P. J. O'Rourke      

Disapproval of prohibition is not the same as support for prohibited substances.  I do not think we should burn witches at the stake, but that does not mean I support witchcraft. 

I think that all the currently prohibited drugs should be legalized, regulated and taken back from organized crime, but that does not mean I support drug use.

When over 70 per cent of Americans demanded the repeal of alcohol prohibition, they were not expressing support for drinking, alcoholism or Al Capone. They were expressing belated recognition of the painfully obvious.

The criminalisation of drugs has led to a situation where enormous numbers of young people are buying unlicensed Ecstasy from unregulated dealers in a market in which the Government cannot intervene. We must legalize drugs because they are dangerous, not because they are safe.

It is agreed by reasonable people that one of the results of anti-drug laws is to support the price of drugs and make their sale lucrative. If drugs were legalized, the price would fall, and the motive to promote them would fade away. Since anyone who wants drugs can get them now, usage would be unlikely to increase.

Crime would go down when addicts didn't have to steal to support their habits, and law enforcement would benefit from the disappearance of drug-financed bribery, payoffs and corruption.  crime income fuels drug war support

All of this is so obvious that the opposition to the legalization of drugs seems inexplicable--unless you ask who would be hurt the most by the repeal of drug laws.

The international drug cartels would be put out of business. Drug enforcement agencies would be unnecessary. Drug wholesalers and retailers would have to seek other employment.

The "prison industrial complex" from lawyers and courts to prisons and parole officers. Who would benefit if drugs  were legalized? The public--because both drug usage and its associated crimes would diminish. 

Despite the logic of this argument, few political candidates have had the nerve to question the way our drug laws act as a price support system, and encourage drug usage.

Am I in favor of drugs? Not at all. Drug abuse has led to an epidemic of human suffering. Grass seems relatively harmless, but I have not known anyone who used hard drugs and emerged undamaged. Still, in most societies throughout human history, drug use has been treated realistically--as a health problem, not a moral problem.

Have our drug laws prevented anyone from using drugs? Apparently not. Have they given us the world's largest prison population, cost us billions of dollars and helped create the most violent society in the first world? Yes. From an objective point of view--what's the point?

Tidbits home           Tidbits 14

Just as proponents of syringe exchange, and of Latin American sovereignty and rights, and of access to pain medication, and of asset forfeiture reform, and of sentencing reform, and of police practice reform, and of racial justice, and of smaller government, and of violence reduction, and of civil liberties are discovering, it is impossible to advocate for rational changes in one part of Prohibition without feeling the full weight of an opposition dedicated to the maintenance of the illusion that it can work. Because when as great a structure as the Drug War machine has been constructed on a foundation of thin air, akin to an overfilled balloon, it is the unassuming man with the pin in his hand wstop the drug war machineho must be silenced and defeated.

 So the feds are right. Medical marijuana is not about the sick and the dying. It is about Lockheed Martin and the defense industry. It is about the private prison industry, and the companies who build them, and the unions of the men and women who staff them. It is about textile and petrochemical companies. It is about an excuse to deploy our military forces in Latin America. It is about the seizing and conversion of assets into the treasuries of governments. It is about the perpetuity of bureaucratic careers and bureaucratic agencies. It is about the stick which is used in controlling poor and minority communities. And it is about federal power over the lives of every single American in every state of the union. It is not about the sick. Or the dying. Or the children. Or even marijuana. It is about the Drug War itself.

So the time is upon us. The time for all of those advocates of all of those rational reforms to arrive together at the inescapable conclusion that the feds, in their own deceitful way, have been right all along. To paraphrase President Clinton's own campaign theme, "It's the Drug War, stupid." And it is time, through the prism of caring for the sick, or allowing syringes to the addicted, or justice to the oppressed, that all of the advocates of all of the various sub-issues begin to examine, very critically and very publicly, what the war has wrought. For we are fighting a common enemy in the drug war establishment. And in defending their indefensible system, the thing they want most to avoid is the coalescing of the resistance. Their structure, the enormous and imposing Drug War machine, sits upon a foundation which, like an overfilled balloon, is full of nothing but air. What we need to understand, as the drug warriors obviously do, is that we, as reformers, are in possession of the pins.